GS Logo
The Green Sheet, Inc

Please Log in

A Thing
View Archives

View PDF of this issue

Care to Share?

Table of Contents

Lead Story

Diversification versus specialization: Which is better?


Industry Update

NetBank bubble bursts over mortgage loans

Feds propose rules on Internet gambling

Merchants give Congress their take on interchange

Kinks at the QSR drive-thru

Is the PCI DSS pie in the sky? The NRF's Hogan wants to know

Ontario nixes 'use it or lose it' gift cards


The skinny on trade associations

U.K. banks push contactless tech, despite consumer demand for cash

Ron Delnevo
Bank Machine Ltd.


The assault on interchange widens

Patti Murphy
The Takoma Group

Coping with the credit crunch

Biff Matthews
CardWare International

Clich├ęs, monsters and a dog named Spot


Street SmartsSM:
Next stop: Tradeshows

Dee Karawadra
Impact PaySystem

Using e-mail effectively: Managing lists

Nancy Drexler
Marketing Moguls

Don't let security slide

Steve Schwimmer
Renaissance Merchant Services

PCI DSS implementation: A concise review

Robert Heinrich
Alpha Card Services Inc.

Dam spam with secure e-mail

Michael Petitti

The next ISO widow could be yours

Adam Atlas
Attorney at Law

Company Profile

Comstar Interactive

New Products

PIN protection for online purchases

PIN Debit Service
ATM Direct

A payment plug-in quick as a hare

Skipjack Payment Plug-in
Skipjack Financial Services, Inc.


Optimism is an inside job





Resource Guide


A Bigger Thing

The Green Sheet Online Edition

October 22, 2007  •  Issue 07:10:02

previous next

Feds propose rules on Internet gambling

The Federal Reserve Board and the U.S. Treasury Department have proposed rules implementing the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act, which was signed into law last year, and initial industry responses suggested implementation would be a nonevent for acquirers and their partners.

"My read is that the entire payments industry will not have many issues with the way the regulators interpreted the law," said Rob Drozdowski, the Electronic Transactions Association Senior Director, Research and Information. "They may not like the law, but the regs seem to be about as good as one could hope for."

The rules, proposed as a new set of federal regulations (Reg. GG), set out how the government intends to enforce a 2006 law that aims to stop most forms of Internet gambling by U.S. residents by making it illegal for banks and other payments companies to process transactions tied to Internet gambling.

That law has been a contentious issue, with financial services executives arguing against having to police customer payments and some lawmakers complaining about inequities created by the law since forms of gambling exist legally in almost every state.

"By continuing to prohibit Internet gambling in the U.S., the U.S. has left Americans who choose to gamble online without meaningful consumer protections," noted a statement from the office of Rep. Barney Frank, D-Mass.

Frank, who chairs the House Financial Services Committee, introduced legislation creating exemptions to the online gambling ban.

The proposal, known as HR 2046 or the Internet Gambling Regulation and Enforcement Act of 2007, also sets forth plans for a federal regulatory and enforcement framework for licensing companies that want to accept online bets from Americans, to the extent permitted by local jurisdictions and sports leagues. No action has been taken yet on Frank's proposal, which was introduced in April.

The Reg. GG proposal, issued for public comment earlier this month, places the burden of compliance on companies that have direct relationships with Internet gaming businesses.

Firms that are clearly exempt from the proposal's requirements include check clearing houses and the financial institutions that clear checks, certain banks in wire transfer and automated clearing house (ACH) transactions, and all intermediary banks.

While all major payment systems are covered by the rules (ACH, card, check, money transmitting businesses and wire transfer networks), there are broad exemptions for any business that "relies and complies with the written policy and procedures of the designated payment system."

The proposed regulation also provides examples of policies and procedures that payment systems subject to the law may wish to consider. The focus: increased due diligence and knowing your customers.

For the card acquiring businesses, "following the operating regulations of the card brands and the coding system for the transaction should be adequate," Drozdowski said. "Of course, knowingly allowing someone to misclassify a transaction would be a violation of both this law and the card brand operating regs."

Copies of the proposed regulation are available online at Public comments are requested by Dec. 12, 2007. The authors of Reg. GG indicated a desire to have it take effect next year.

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

previous next

Spotlight Innovators:

North American Bancard | Simpay | USAePay | Impact Paysystems | Board Studios