GS Logo
The Green Sheet, Inc

Please Log in

A Thing
View Archives

View PDF of this issue

Care to Share?


Table of Contents

Lead Story

Durbin, a mixed bag

Patti Murphy
ProScribes Inc.

News

Industry Update

Visa, MasterCard settle with Justice Department

TIN matching: A problem with solutions

Jumio aiming to change CNP landscape

Features

Research Rundown

ISOMetrics:
Global stats on mobile payments

Selling Prepaid

Prepaid in brief

Meta achieves closure on 'difficult year'

Gift card potential still untapped

Views

Taking PCI seriously

Tim Cranny
Panoptic Security Inc.

Education

Street SmartsSM:
Networking groups and referral marketing - Part III

Bill Pirtle
MPCT Publishing Co.

ISO and MLS dispute settlement

Adam Atlas
Attorney at Law

Become a profit asset, not an operations cost

Daniel Wadleigh
Marketing Consultant

Identifying and securing your highest risk merchants

Steve Robb
ControlScan

Can a POS system determine your success in a vertical market?

Jerry Cibley
United Bank Card Inc.

Look like a leader: Seven essential steps

Peggy Bekavac Olson
Strategic Marketing

Dress for successful sales

Jeff Fortney
Clearent LLC

Company Profile

Century Payments Inc.

Empower Processing

New Products

Mobile POS with tableside manners

Restaurant Pro Express Mobile
Company: pcAmerica

Putting social into mobile payments

ProPay Link
ProPay Inc.

Inspiration

Cocktail hour confidential

Departments

10 Years ago in
The Green Sheet

Forum

Resource Guide

Datebook

Miscellaneous

2011 Calendar of events

A Bigger Thing

The Green Sheet Online Edition

August 08, 2011  •  Issue 11:08:01

previous next

Dress for successful sales

By Jeff Fortney

When I was growing up, school dress codes were very clear: no jeans, no tennis shoes, and no T-shirts; shirts had to have a collar; boys had to wear long pants; girls had to wear skirts - unless they wore culottes (garments that look like skirts but are actually pants).

These dress codes made back to school shopping a challenge. But in hindsight, it's easy to now see their benefits. They created the proper atmosphere: how a person dressed was (in theory) not used to define his or her status.

It reduced gray areas, making it less likely someone's arbitrary personal tastes could define "appropriate" attire. Ultimately, it made everyone similar in appearance, the aim being to create an enviroment where nothing detracted from academics.

Then and now

In the 1960s, dress codes existed in the professional world, as well. White collar was not just a way of defining a job; it was what was worn. When Ross Perot founded Electronic Data Systems he carried forward the IBM dress code of the day.

You could wear anything you wished as long as it was a white shirt and a dark - black or blue - suit. You also wore your sport coat everywhere, including when you were sitting at your desk.

In the 1980s, there was even a popular book titled Dress for Success. The premise was that dressing appropriately to fit your intended role was the first step toward succeeding in business. Brown clothing of any kind was worn only by those that had already "made it." What you wore helped you demonstrate an air of professionalism so you would be recognized as such.

Today, the Dress for Success philosophy has created a cottage industry, including organizations that give free suits to job seekers for interviewing purposes. Yet applying these principles to the sales profession poses problems. Indeed, evidence suggests that by following the tenets as defined in the book, you could actually harm your efforts, rather than help them.

Two questions

So the question arises, What's the best way to dress for a sales call? The answer is no longer black and white. In fact, before you can determine how to dress for a particular sales call, you must first ask two questions:

  1. Who am I selling to?

    The original concept behind dressing for success was to create a positive initial impression. Today, wearing a white shirt, tie and black suit has a strong likelihood of leaving the wrong impression if worn at the wrong time.

    First, identify your target and then seek to mirror your target's standard style of dress. For example, if you are calling on mom-and-pop stores, you may find these retailers commonly wear polo shirts and slacks.

    In today's economy, walking in wearing a black suit may give them the impression that you represent the IRS. This first impression would prevent you from building a strong rapport with the merchant.

    On the other hand, if you're selling to banks or major corporations, not dressing in suit and tie like a banker or financial expert could cause you to fail before you even begin your presentation.

  2. What am I representing?

    Notice the question is not, Whom am I representing? You are creating an initial visual impression, and in conjunction with your 30-second commercial, that impression can make or break the sale.

    It's critical to help define that initial impression. Do you want to appear sophisticated? Sporty? Studious? Dress in accordance with the way you wish to be perceived.

    Remember, over 60 percent of any face-to-face conversation is visual. What someone sees often influences what he or she hears. Don't create an added hurdle to the sale by over- or under-dressing.

Rules to follow

Once you've answered the two questions, follow these basic rules:

Yes, how you dress really is that important. It won't help you overcome objections or close sales, but it can close doors before they even open. Sales is already a difficult profession; don't let how you dress make it even harder.

Jeff Fortney is Vice President, ISO Channel Management with Clearent LLC. He has more than 17 years' experience in the payments industry. Contact him at jeff@clearent.com or 972-618-7340.

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

previous next

Spotlight Innovators:

North American Bancard | USAePay | Impact Paysystems | Electronic Merchant Systems | Board Studios