GS Logo
The Green Sheet, Inc

Please Log in

A Thing
View Archives

View PDF of this issue

Care to Share?

Table of Contents

Lead Story

Congress, Fed pressured to reconsider interchange caps

Patti Murphy
The Takoma Group


Industry Update

London steers toward open payments by 2012 Olympics

Merchant coalition backs interchange overhaul

Girl Scout cookie sales go mobile

Trade Association News


Ingredients essential to thriving enterprises

Research Rundown

The rise of the debit card

Measuring your ad's ROO

Selling Prepaid

Prepaid in brief

Has the prepaid tax refund moment arrived?

Compliance partnership made for two


Thoughts on the economy (in hindsight)

Brandes Elitch
CrossCheck Inc.

Cell phones as marketing tools

Steve Schwimmer
Renaissance Merchant Services


Street SmartsSM:
Earning and keeping merchants' trust

Ken Musante
Eureka Payments LLC

It pays to keep your customers happy

Jeffrey Shavitz
Charge Card Systems Inc.

Security in a mobile world

Tim Cranny
Panoptic Security Inc.

Stockholm Syndrome and the payment pro

Jeff Fortney
Clearent LLC

Helping Level 4 merchants comply with PCI DSS 2.0

Joan Herbig

Leads, leads, leads - Part 2: Lead management

Peggy Bekavac Olson
Strategic Marketing

Company Profile

FrontStream Payments Inc.

New Products

A global e-commerce payment solution

Digital River World Payments
Digital River Inc.


The mind's the limit - so expand it



Resource Guide


A Bigger Thing

The Green Sheet Online Edition

March 14, 2011  •  Issue 11:03:01

previous next


Is it OK to charge IRS reporting fees?

I commented in GS Online's MLS Forum on the IRS reporting issue ... I raised this issue because it appears to me, and some of my MLS associates, that some processors will be using the requirement to report information to the IRS as a means of adding fees and enhancing their revenue.

I would love to see The Green Sheet get ahead of this with an article exploring what, if any, the cost is for a processor to report the IRS required information. The idea that a processor must charge a fee to a merchant to verify their glos TIN makes little sense. The processor should have validated such information when the original application was submitted and entered into their system. Therefore the need to validate is their responsibility, and the cost for doing so should be by them.

Tom Gregory
N4NW LLC - Complete Merchant Services


Comments in an MLS Forum discussion thread titled "IRS can take 28 percent of merchant gross V/MC starting Jan 2012?" appear to indicate complying with this requirement can be quite time consuming, at least initially. Whether it is aboveboard or makes long-term business sense to charge merchants for this is an excellent question. We'd love to hear from other people about this and will ask one of our contributing writers to delve into this topic.

We have touched on the IRS reporting issue previously but haven't discussed whether collecting this information is something processors can charge merchants for. Most recently, advisory board member Justin Milmeister, President of Elite Merchant Solutions, stated the following in "Game changers for 2011 - Part 2," The Green Sheet, Feb. 28, 2011, issue 11:02:02:

"Another game-changer is the IRS reporting requirement stemming from the Housing and Economic Recovery Act of 2008, which begins for transactions on Jan 1, 2011, and will require merchant acquirers to report the gross processing volumes from their respective merchants. Now, if the tax identification number (TIN) and business legal name does not match what the IRS has, or if it is nonexistent, the merchant will be subject to IRS withholdings. The kicker here is that even when you do cure this problem, it can take a fair amount of time to get your funds released."

Adam Atlas wrote in detail about the new reporting requirements in "Making hay of new IRS reporting requirements," The Green Sheet, Nov. 8, 2011, issue 10:11:01. He did not suggest processors charge merchants for their efforts related to the requirement, but he did mention there could be an upside to the reporting.

He wrote that "you can use this as an opportunity to educate merchants about how they can use the reporting to enhance their business practices and to help ensure they do not run afoul of the IRS. Doing so will, at the very least, make you look good, which could mean happier customers and a stickier portfolio."

Thank you for bringing this issue to our attention. We hope this is the beginning of a spirited, enlightening discussion.


Call us, write us

Would you like us to cover a particular topic? Is there someone you consider an industry leader? Did you like or dislike a recent article in The Green Sheet? What do you think of our latest GSQ? Email your comments and feedback to or call us at 800-757-4441.

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

previous next

Spotlight Innovators:

North American Bancard | USAePay | Impact Paysystems | Board Studios