Page 28 - gs260101
P. 28

Insights and Expertise




        When payment                                            Key allegations

                                                                The investigation uncovered a pattern of misleading com-
        providers trap                                          mercial behavior that went far beyond aggressive sales
                                                                tactics. The providers sold on the headline pricing alone
        merchants                                               and intentionally left out essential fee components, which
                                                                obviously distorted the merchants’ ability to assess the
                                                                real cost of their service.

                                                                Many businesses received charges from the provider even
                                                                after cancellation or withdrawal of consent, which came
                                                                from unfamiliar or altered company names, which made
                                                                tracking even more confusing for the victims.

                                                                The cancellation journey itself added another layer of
                                                                complexity to the mix, as merchants faced long, unclear
                                                                processes  combined  with  unexpected  early  termination
                                                                fees that were all hidden behind hyperlinks in online
                                                                agreements, rather than being clearly presented during
                                                                the onboarding process.
        By Viktoria Soltesz
        PSP Angels                                              Court ruling, remedies and outcomes

                  he fintech landscape is more competitive than   The proposed court order required First American to pay
                  ever: neobanks, payment processors, alternative   $4.9 million as remedy for the merchants but also intro-
                  payment methods, instant payments, digital    duced  stricter  conditions  for  the  future.  The  order  re-
        T wallets. Merchants don't even know what to            moved early termination fees for electronic agreements
        pick. Innovation and low fees dominate every merchant's   signed before April 2020 and set clear and simple cancella-
        roadmap, but for some unknown reason, sourcing and      tion procedures for all new business. The order also made
        evaluating payment providers are still considered some-  transparent disclosure mandatory  for  all material  terms
        thing that finance takes care of. This is a BIG mistake.  with explicit, informed consent before any charges.

        Payments and banking today impact customer experience,   Refund  distribution started  soon  after,  with  more  than
        risk management, technology, product development, data   $2.6 million already returned  to affected merchants by
        security, compliance, finance and more. These should be   early 2025, but the case continued with a formal monitor-
        considered a standalone function, an essential element of   ing program.
        the business strategy, not just a part of finance.      The issue

        Even more alarming: the people managing payment pro-    This case highlights a much bigger issue than a simple,
        viders are not adequately trained to spot the traps. Key ar-  unfair contract or one aggressive provider. Even though
        eas such as how providers affect cash flow, contracts, com-  banks and payment providers are private businesses
        pliance and other essential aspects in a business remain   fighting for profit, taking advantage of merchants' lack of
        absent from accounting, economics courses and MBAs.     knowledge creates an uneven playing field, and we face
                                                                the  consequences  of it  every day. When providers  ben-
        The case                                                efit from confusion rather than clarity, the motivation is
        One FTC case that shook the industry started with a hand-  to keep merchants in the dark, but this only creates more
        ful of providers targeting small and midsize merchants,   regulatory pressure and long-term instability for everyone
        many with limited English proficiency, using false prom-  involved. The root cause runs deeper, as payments and
        ises of low monthly fees (as low as zero) and significant
        savings. For years, these transactions were handled with
        hidden three-year auto-renewing contracts, and the pro-              When payments go wrong
        vider failed to disclose periodic rate hikes, as well.
                                                                  The FTC's enforcement action against First American
        Thankfully, regulators stepped into action when they re-  Payment Systems LP and affiliates shows how deceptive
        alized how these providers trapped merchants, and the     contracts and hidden fees can trap merchants and prompt
        FTC sued The First American Payment Systems LP (d/b/a     regulatory intervention. This case underscores why
        Merimac Capital), along with affiliates Eliot Manage-     payments oversight can't sit solely with finance and why
        ment Group LLC (d/b/a Sundance Payment Solutions) and     informed leadership and education are essential to protect
        Think Point Financial LLC (d/b/a Cypress Bay Solutions    cash flow, compliance and long-term business stability.
        and Impulse Payments) in 2022.
        28
   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33