Page 27 - gs260101

Insights and Expertise

What the FCA move really means Education is equally critical. Leaving the press to shape
the story all but guarantees sensational headlines. In-
The FCA’s shift is not an invitation to reckless spending. dustry stakeholders must do more to tell their own story,
Limitless contactless does not mean limitless risk. Instead, showing not only how fraud is contained but also how li-
it recognizes that digital wallets have operated with no ability typically rests with the bank, not the individual.
fixed ceiling for years, protected by biometric authentica- Finally, a constructive approach is needed. Risk concerns
tion. Leveling the playing field between wallet-based pay- should not be brushed aside. Providers should respond
ments and physical cards isn’t radical; it’s logical. with “yes, and…” solutions. This approach also helps pre-
vent the perception that the industry is either complacent
It also signals maturity from the regulator. By handing re- or defensive.
sponsibility to card providers, the FCA is acknowledging
that the industry can balance risk and innovation without When providers openly acknowledge risk, they establish
constant intervention. That should be read as trust, not credibility; when they immediately follow that acknowl-
negligence. edgement with concrete mitigation steps, they establish
authority. It’s a far more effective strategy than insisting
For SMEs, the implications are particularly positive. Pay- everything is safe. Safety is never absolute, and consumers
ment friction is often more than an irritation; it is a com- know it. They want honesty paired with competence: an
mercial obstacle. If customers hesitate at the till because industry that admits challenges and then demonstrates it
they fear a high-value contactless transaction won’t work, is equipped to manage them. Yes, fraud is a risk, and here
the result is longer queues, awkward conversations and are the detection systems we run 24/7. Yes, losing a card is
sometimes abandoned purchases. Removing that ceiling frightening, and here is how liability protection ensures
allows smaller businesses to focus on serving customers you will not be left out of pocket.
rather than managing arbitrary limits.
Industry responsibility
But trust won’t automatically follow. Consumers need re-
assurance before they embrace change. Reassurance re- The FCA’s move reflects confidence in responsible in-
quires more than a single message delivered at launch. It novation. It suggests payments technology has matured
needs repetition, consistency and visible proof. A consum- enough to handle greater flexibility. But trust comes with
er who hears once that liability sits with the bank may still responsibility. Providers must keep fraud frameworks
doubt it the next time a scary story appears in the media. modern, updating monitoring, machine learning and con-
Confidence comes from seeing a system operate reliably sumer protection rules as behaviors evolve.
over time.
SMEs stand to gain the most from reduced friction. Less
There’s a lesson here from other sectors: cybersecurity time spent managing awkward conversations at the till
firms don’t rely on one-off disclosures; they issue con- means more time serving customers. When people feel
tinuous updates, advisories and clear explanations of how safe as well as served, they’re more likely to support
threats are mitigated. Payments needs the same drumbeat smaller businesses and keep local economies strong.
of communication, not reactive statements issued only The principle is simple: progress and protection must go
when anxiety is already spiraling. together. Payments innovation only works if it acknowl-
edges human anxieties and addresses them directly.
A framework for anxiety-free innovation
Moving forward
If payment providers, policymakers and merchants want
to ensure this shift delivers genuine benefits, they must The FCA’s decision to allow providers to set their own
lead with empathy. People’s fears are not irrational in their contactless limits should be seen as an opportunity, not a
own minds. A parent worrying that a lost card could be threat. It raises the same question every payment innova-
drained in minutes is expressing a basic human instinct tion has raised: how do we push forward without spook-
to protect resources. Meeting that instinct with dismissal ing the very people we are trying to serve? The answer lies
deepens resistance. in empathy, clarity and trust. By recognizing consumer
fears, explaining safeguards plainly and committing to
Transparency is the next essential ingredient. Fraud moni- ongoing education, the payments industry can ensure in-
toring, liability frameworks, tokenization and biometric novation is welcomed rather than resisted.
checks all exist to protect consumers, but they are rarely
explained clearly. Now is the moment for providers, regulators and SMEs to
work together in building a payments environment that is
I doubt that 90 percent of the public could explain one of modern, safe and confidence-inspiring. Progress will not
them accurately, which is partly because they are systems be measured in the size of the limit, but in the depth of
that run in the background and partly because the pay- trust consumers feel when they tap.
ments industry doesn’t explain them well. If customers do
not know what safeguards apply, those safeguards might Scott Dawson is head of sales and strategic partnerships at DECTA.
as well not exist in their eyes. Contact Scott via LinkedIn at linkedin.com/in/scott-dawson-uk.

27