Page 26 - gs260101

Insights and Expertise
How to introduce new payment initiatives

without causing public anxiety

the ground beneath them is constantly shifting.

The irony is that most of these changes are designed to
make life safer and simpler, yet they land as uncertainty.
The gap between industry intent and public perception
has rarely been wider. Before any discussion about limits
or fraud rates can land, the industry has to reckon with
this widening gap. If customers feel blindsided, their in-
stinctive response will always be to resist.

Why new initiatives trigger anxiety

By Scott Dawson History has a habit of repeating itself. When contactless
payments were introduced in 2007, the £10 limit was de-
DECTA scribed as reckless. Each subsequent increase—£20 in
2012, £30 in 2015, £45 in 2020, and £100 in 2021—was ac-
he Financial Conduct Authority, which over- companied by warnings that fraud would explode. None
sees financial markets, firms and consumer of those spikes arrived. Instead, adoption soared, trans-
protection in the UK, signaled it will allow card action values climbed and fraud remained proportionally
T providers to set the contactless payment limit tiny.
for their customers. Now, on top of a thousand other exis-
tential threats, from ocean acidification to microplastics, But consumer anxiety doesn’t vanish with positive evi-
anyone who finds a lost debit card could spend every dence. Money carries an outsized psychological weight.
penny you have in a single tap. Behavioral science tells us people are loss-averse: the pain
of losing £100/$127 feels far greater than the pleasure of
But there’s reason not to panic: while tap and go card gaining the same amount. In payments, that bias skews
transactions are limited to £100 a transaction, digital wal- people toward overestimating the likelihood of fraud and
lets authenticated on-device have had unlimited contact- underestimating the protections in place.
less payments since their inception. However, there’s been
no meaningful increase in contactless fraud. Research from What SMEs Need From Their Payments
Provider underlines this. Nearly half of consumers said
In fact, street robberies are going down, which is not they believe small and midsize enterprises (SMEs) should
what you’d expect if every stolen phone were a veritable have the same payment technology as large companies.
goldmine. Contactless fraud only accounted for £41.1 mil-
lion/$52.2 million in fraud losses in 2024 out of £1.17 bil- One third admitted they avoid SMEs if they think fraud
lion/$1.49 billion, or 3.5 percent. Not to mention the FCA protection is lacking. Many are prepared to trade speed
believes, based on industry feedback, that most card for reassurance: convenience matters, but not at the ex-
schemes will keep the £100/$127 limit. pense of perceived safety. The insight here is clear. Inno-
vation in payments will fail if it doesn’t take account of
It seems panic over the increased limit was irrational, but these anxieties.
it is understandable. Most consumers don’t read FCA press
releases or check financial crime statistics, a fact borne out A related point often missed in policy debates is that con-
by crime being at a 30-year low.. sumer trust is cumulative, not transactional. People don’t
form their views on safety based on one announcement.
Also, psychology has proven again and again that human They build their sense of risk from every payment experi-
beings are emotional before they are rational. Everyone, ence they’ve had: the time a card was declined without
from regulators to payments companies, needs to work explanation, the shop that required an unexpected PIN
with that instead of ignoring it. So, how do we move pay- entry, the friend who had to cancel their card after a suspi-
ments forward without scaring away the people we want cious charge.
to help?
These moments accumulate into a personal mental mod-
One deep root of this anxiety is the feeling that financial el of how payments work; anything that sits outside that
technology keeps moving faster than people can sensibly model feels automatically suspect. That’s why every new
track. Every year brings a new system, a new rule change, development must be introduced with careful framing
a new security standard. For consumers, especially those rather than assuming consumers will intuitively under-
who don’t follow industry developments, it can feel like stand its logic.
26