Attorneys are
Going to Love Check Conversion
For two years I
have been hearing the same statement from those in the industry who
are excited about Point-of-Sale Check Conversion. The statement is
that Check Conversion is just like bankcard was in the early
ë80s.
Some of those who
are repeating this mantra believe that Check Conversion is turning
paper checks into the equivalent of draft capture settlement in the
old bankcard world. Of course, checks have virtually nothing in
common with bankcard in that there is NO issuer or ruling body in
checks, as in bankcard. Authorization is NOT against an issuer's
approved file in which an open to buy is known, nor is the issuer
bearing risk under some floor level, since with checks no one knows
if money is present at the time of authorization, or if it will still
be there at the time of clearance.
I could go on and
on, but then that is what I have been doing in article after article
about this subject over the last couple of years. While I have 101
reasons (hyperboleóhonestly, the list is very long), why check
conversion is NOT just like bankcard in the early ë80s, I have
finally found one reason why it may be.
One of the things
that we all remember about the early ë80s conversion of bankcard
merchants from paper to Draft Capture is that some sales
organizations told merchants that they would get their sales drafts
deposited in their bank account the following day, when at the time,
it took several days to a week to actually get funded. We might
consider these past sales statements as stretching the truth to get
the sale, but the stretches that are beginning to show up in check
conversion are nothing short of a con game and circus hucksterism,
and can do nothing but give the concept of Check Conversion a black
eye.
Check Plus
Systems, Inc., operating from Clayton, Alabama and Port St. Lucie,
Florida, has the most blatant example of what I am talking about. In
the sales materials that Check Plus is using and giving to merchants,
Check Plus states the following in the first paragraph of its "Dear
Future Merchants" letter:
"First, the
customer's driver license is searched to see if the individual
presenting the check has any outstanding bad checks anywhere in the
U.S. Second, the customer's account number is searched to see if the
account has any outstanding bad checks."
Although there are
a number of companies that have outstanding checks on their system,
there is no universal way to check them all.
The letter
continues,
"Third and most
significantly, the system checks the account to assure that the
customer has the funds available to cover the face amount of the
check being presented."
No one in the
country can make a real-time check of bank account balances or make
such an assurance. If this were true, then Check Guarantee would not
be in such high demand for Check Conversion.
While Check
Plus's materials attempt to convince a merchant that their system has
more knowledge and capabilities than the Check Verification and
Guarantee authorizations systems already in place, the truth is that
Check Conversion is using the very same systems and in the very same
way. Furthermore, these systems present the very same risks to the
merchant.
The differences
between converting checks to the ACH system and depositing them at
the bank are really very minor. In both cases, the use of funds will
likely be the same, provided the merchant goes to the bank each day.
The cost per item deposited may even be greater with ACH, since the
merchant probably has too few checks to be exceeding a minimum
account charge, which will not be reduced should ACH deposits take
the place of physical deposits. If this is not true, the merchant
account may well be on analysis.
The cost
difference between returned ACH and returned checks is favorable to
ACH. However, most often, these fees are reimbursed by a Guarantee
company as part of the fee, and Guarantee is still needed unless the
merchant wants to eat the cost of account closed and insufficient
funds checks.
Of course, there
will be some problems with the conversion of credit union and savings
and loan checks which are paid through commercial banks.
Additionally, large value checks and all business checks can not be
converted at the point-of-sale, leaving some merchants to run two
check systems.
While Check
Conversion will clearly find favor among certain merchants, such as
those with multiple locations who are seeking cash consolidation
opportunities, or those who have no commercial trade, or only low
value checks, it will also find favor with those who think it is
something it is not.
As this product
warms up, the problems are likely to grow, and only time will tell if
the sales leaders sell the lie or sell the truth. The truth will
sell, but the lie will always sell more...for a while.
[Return]
Copyright © The Green
Sheet, Inc., 1999. All rights reserved.
First Published November 1,
1999