Legal
Factoid
Lost or Stolen
Checks
by G. Bradley
Hargrave, Esq.
One who loses
a check, or has it stolen, may still enforce its payment. UCC
[Rev.] Section 3-309 states that a person not in possession
of a check may enforce its payment provided that (i) he had it in his
possession and was entitled to payment at the time the loss occurred,
(ii) its loss was not due to its transfer or lawful seizure and,
(iii) its unavailability is due to its destruction, irretrievable
loss or theft.
In order to
have a judgment on a lost check entered in one's favor, a few
evidentiary hurdles must be cleared. First, the term(s) of the check,
and the right to receive payment, must be proved. (This might be
achieved by the introduction of a photocopy of the check or invoice
of the underlying transaction, as well as by credible testimony that
the check was delivered as payment). Second, satisfactory evidence
must be offered to establish that the claimant cannot reasonably
obtain possession of the lost item. Finally, the court must be
convinced that the drawer of the check is adequately protected
against any double payment which might occur by reason of the claim
of another to the lost item. (In the event that the check was payable
to bearer, establishing "adequate protection" might pose some
significant problems, as anyone in possession of the item can likely
enforce its payment. Lost items payable to order stand a
significantly better chance of being enforced).
While there is
little case law involving this fairly new UCC section, a considerable
number of cases have considered its relatively similar predecessor.
In those cases, the courts have appeared quite willing to enforce
payment of the lost item. Accordingly, one who finds himself in a
"lost check" situation is urged to take the necessary steps to
enforce payment.
[Return]