GS Logo
The Green Sheet, Inc

Please Log in

Banner Ad
View Archives

View flipbook of this issue

Care to Share?


Table of Contents

Lead Story

Visa and Mastercard at 50: Evolving in evolving market

Patti Murphy

News

Industry Update

Major Visa, MasterCard settlement voided: Now what?

PCI SSC unveils new tools for small, midsize merchants

Denmark's Nets, BOKIS piloting digital wallet

UK joins backlash against interchange

Features

GS Advisory Board:
The state of mobile today - Part 1

The art of shopping cart conversion

Cliff Teston

ISOMetrics:
Payment technology timeline

Views

Merging lanes on the POS road map

Dale S. Laszig
DSL Direct LLC

Fraud in the payment system: What - me worry?

Brandes Elitch
CrossCheck Inc.

Deaf to new product introductions?

Steven Feldshuh
Merchants' Choice Payment Solutions East

Education

Street SmartsSM:
Time to treat MLSs right

John Tucker
1st Capital Loans LLC

Contract management in the paperless age

Adam Atlas
Attorney at Law

How and why to pursue ISVs

Kelly Cullum
SUR Technology Holdings LLC

Company Profile

CreditCardProcessing.com

New Products

Web-based statement analysis, CRM platform

Clientvine
Clientvine LLC

Flexible, EMV-ready mobile payment solution

MP200
Castles Technology Co. Ltd.

Inspiration

Are achievers born or made?

Departments

Letter from the editors

Readers Speak

Resource Guide

Datebook

Skyscraper Ad

The Green Sheet Online Edition

July 24, 2016  •  Issue 16:07:02

previous next

UK joins backlash against interchange

British consumers filed a class action lawsuit against MasterCard Worldwide July 6, 2016, seeking relief from what they describe as "illegal card charges" that violate terms and conditions of the Consumer Rights Act that became effective in October 2015.

Visa Inc. was excluded from the case, due to legal counsel's contention that Visa has set its rates at a "reasonable level." Grievances highlight growing dissatisfaction with credit card pricing models that led to prior actions by the European Union and U.S. retailers against payment card brands.

Legal analysts noted that MasterCard may have to pay as much as £19 billion ($24.5 billion) in collective damages if the court rules in favor of the plaintiffs, who represent all British consumers except those who specifically opt out of the class action.

The case, reported to be the largest class action in British history, follows a 2007 ruling by the European Commission that found MasterCard's interchange fees violated competition law between 1992 and 2007. MasterCard subsequently reduced fees in 2008 but challenged the legality of the EC ruling. While the case was finally closed in 2014, the new British claim shows the fight is far from over.

"The prices of everything we all bought from 1992 to 2008 were higher than they should have been as a result of the unlawful conduct of MasterCard," stated Walter Merricks, legal representative of the UK consumer class. "My aim is to get the redress to which UK consumers are entitled and to ensure that MasterCard cannot hold on to the illegal profits it made. This case should send a signal to companies that break competition laws at the expense of UK consumers that they do so at their financial peril."

Merricks, Commander of the Most Excellent Order of the British Empire and a former UK Chief Financial Services Ombudsman, is working with London-based law firm Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan LLP and Chicago-based Gerchen Keller Capital LLC to establish a process flow for orderly distribution of funds to millions of UK consumers involved in the settlement.

Consumer Rights Act

Great Britain's far-reaching Consumer Rights Act, enacted in October 2015, replaced the former Sale of Goods, Unfair Terms in Consumer Contracts Regulations and Supply of Goods and Services acts. Designed to protect all facets of consumer rights, the law addresses product quality, merchandise returns, digital content rights and delivery rights.

The new act further stipulates that consumers have up to 30 days after purchase to request a full refund. "After 30 days you will not be legally entitled to a full refund if your item develops a fault, although some sellers may offer you an extended refund period."

Proceedings against MasterCard, based on the allegations that the card brand's pricing violated the terms of the Consumer Rights Act and harmed UK consumers, are expected to begin in the fourth quarter of 2016. Legal analysts who support the measures have called the landmark case a justified attack against unlawful, anticompetitive conduct that has resulted in untold losses to millions of consumers.

Preparations are underway at the Competition Appeal Tribunal, where the case against MasterCard will be presented. Legal proceedings will include a certification hearing, followed by a general hearing that is expected to begin in 2018, barring any settlement offers by MasterCard.

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

previous next

Spotlight Innovators:

North American Bancard | Harbortouch | USAePay | IRISCRM.COM