GS Logo
The Green Sheet, Inc

Please Log in

A Thing
View Archives

View PDF of this issue

Care to Share?

Table of Contents

Lead Story

Partnerships fuel portfolio growth


Industry Update

Direct Air's bankruptcy threatens JetPay

Coalition responds to retailers' debit rule complaint

Consultancy faults PCI tokenization guidance

Heartland breach suit settled

Selling Prepaid

Prepaid in brief

Expo meets expectations in atmosphere of change

Prepaid goes to Washington


Choosing a partner for life

Justin Milmeister
Elite Merchant Solutions

Technology, a catalyst for ISO growth

Mustafa Shehabi
PayCube Inc.


Street SmartsSM:
Plotting a prosperous future

Jeff Fortney
Clearent LLC

Is it time for you to resell integrated payment systems?

Paul Hunter
Sterling Payment Technologies

As a PCI compliance role model, how do you measure up?

Heather Foster

Use new card fees to build merchant rapport

Jeffrey Shavitz and Adam Moss
Charge Card Systems Inc.

Working with outside marketing experts

Peggy Bekavac Olson
Strategic Marketing

No more contract-signing hurdle

Steve Norell
US Merchant Services Inc.

Company Profile

Electronic Payment Exchange

New Products

Wireless payments at the restaurant table

Company: Viableware

Driving donations online for nonprofits

eSelectPlus with DonorDrive
Company: Moneris Solutions


Don't let hot leads slip away


Fulfilling brand promise



Resource Guide


A Bigger Thing

The Green Sheet Online Edition

April 09, 2012  •  Issue 12:04:01

previous next

Coalition responds to retailers' debit rule complaint

On March 15, 2012, a coalition of financial institution trade associations petitioned to file an amicus brief in a lawsuit brought by a group of retail associations. The retailers are protesting the Federal Reserve Board's rule implementing the Durbin Amendment to the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act of 2010.

The retailers' are dissatisfied

An amicus curiae brief is filed by entities not a party to a case but who believe they have information to offer that will assist a court in making a decision. A court decides whether to consider an amicus brief, depending on whether it finds the filers and information to be relevant to the case in question. The retailers' suit was filed in the Federal District Court of the District of Columbia in November 2011 - one month after the final rule implementing the Durbin Amendment went into effect. The suit claims the final debit interchange rule is flawed because the Fed did not follow the law when creating and implementing the rule.

According to the plaintiffs, the Fed considered costs it was barred by law from considering when it developed the new rule, which cut the average debit card interchange rate to approximately half of what it had been. The retailers stated the Fed failed to provide them the full extent of swipe card relief Congress meant for them to have.

Financial institutions disagree

In the proposed amicus brief, the petitioning financial institutions argue that the final rule is flawed, but for opposite reasons of those put forth by the retailers. They claim they will be harmed, and consumers will receive no benefit, if the court decides in favor of the retailers.

The financial institutions' amicus brief states that if the court finds the Fed did not provide the full debit card interchange fee relief Congress intended, it will contradict the congressional mandate in the legislation that the interchange fees include a reasonable rate of return for issuers. The brief also asserts that the "below-cost fee cap" in the Federal Reserve Board's final rule is not in the public's interest because the rule "imposes significant burdens on consumers," the rule imposes "serious harm on financial institutions," and because the final rule "grants a windfall to merchants with no corresponding benefit to consumers."

The brief additionally argues the Durbin Amendment "does not require issuers to enable additional networks for electronic debit transactions or multiple networks for each form of transaction authorization" as the Fed requires in its final rule.

Consumers gained nothing

Trish Wexler, a spokeswoman for the coalition of financial institutions submitting the proposed amicus brief, said, "The merchants have claimed all along that imposing government price controls on interchange fees would directly benefit consumers, yet there is absolutely no evidence that they have lowered their prices. So while consumers have gotten nothing from the retailers, the merchants are back asking the courts to add even more to the $6 billion windfall they are now enjoying."

Bill Cheney, President of the Credit Union National Association, warned deepening the cut in debit interchange fees would mean customers of financial institutions would have new fees and cuts in benefits "that will be needed to continue supporting the payment systems infrastructure."

For additional news stories, please visit and click on "Read the Entire Story" in the center column below the latest news story excerpt. This will take you to the full text of that story, followed by all other news stories posted online.

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

previous next

Spotlight Innovators:

North American Bancard | USAePay | Board Studios