GS Logo
The Green Sheet, Inc

Please Log in

A Thing
View Archives

View PDF of this issue

Care to Share?


Table of Contents

Lead Story

Unbanked, underbanked - untapped

News

Industry Update

HR 5546, the downside

Uncle Sam to get slice of payments pie

Private equity giant going public

MWAA meeting goes the distance

PCI on the menu

Scott Henry
VeriFone

Three-step systemization

Biff Matthews
CardWare International

Features

The consulting guru that could

Industry Leader

Linda Perry –
Unfettered spirit, extraordinary success

Views

PCI on the menu

Scott Henry
VeriFone

Three-step systemization

Biff Matthews
CardWare International

Education

Street SmartsSM:
To Capitol Hill we go

Jason Felts
Advanced Merchant Services

Becoming registered

Adam Atlas
Attorney at Law

Check processing diversification: Hop aboard

Christian Murray
Global eTelecom Inc.

Invest in trust

Jeff Fortney
Clearent LLC

Web site optimization: A route to talent

Curt Hensley
CSH Consulting

Lead with communication

Daniel Wadleigh
Marketing Consultant

Company Profile

GreenSoft Solutions Inc.

New Products

Keep alert with merchant accounts

MercuryAlerts
Mercury Payment Systems LLC

Turbo charge PCI compliance

TurboPCI
TurboPCI Inc.

Inspiration

For better or worse

Miscellaneous

POScript

Departments

Forum

Resource Guide

Datebook

A Bigger Thing

The Green Sheet Online Edition

August 11, 2008  •  Issue 08:08:01

previous next

HR 5546, the downside

As supporters of HR 5546, the Credit Card Fair Fee Act, celebrated the House Judiciary Committee's passage of the bill, opponents, including Visa Inc., called the bill "anti-consumer" and issued a statement to point out its shortcomings.

In the statement, Josh Florum, General Counsel for Visa, said, "The markup of HR 5546 only raises more questions and concerns about an already bad bill." He also said if the bill becomes law, it would "mandate unnecessary regulatory intervention into a fiercely competitive industry that is benefiting consumers, merchants and financial institutions [FIs]."

He added that passage of HR 5546 would especially hurt small banks and credit unions, since the smaller FIs rely on interchange income to support other banking services.

Legalized collusion

The U.S. Department of Justice and the Federal Trade Commission stated this legislation would reduce competition and harm consumers. In a letter sent to Rep. Lamar Smith, R-Texas, both regulatory bodies noted the bill "raises serious constitutional concerns" related to long-standing antitrust laws.

"The legislation would essentially legalize collusion among the nation's largest and most profitable retailers at the expense of consumers, community banks and credit unions," Florum said. "The retail federation wants all of the benefits of the payments system - guaranteed payment, convenience, risk management, reliability and increased sales volume - but wants to shift their cost of doing business onto the backs of consumers."

Dilemma down under

Smith cited Australia as an example of a country that adopted a similar regulatory approach. He said retailers' fees went down, profits went back into retailers' pockets, and "consumers were harmed through less choice, higher prices, fewer rewards and benefits, as well as checkout fees imposed by retailers at the checkout counter."

Ross Federgreen, founder of CSRSI, the Payment Advisors, and a member of The Green Sheet's advisory board, agrees that consumer costs will rise with HR 5546's passage, but that other, more significant factors are involved. The regulatory proposals on Capitol Hill address issues that are much more complex than what lawmakers are conveying to the retailers and the buying public.

"You look at the Australian experience, and, yes, the interchange went down, and consumer costs went up, and Visa is saying that the same thing is going to happen here," Federgreen said. He said he has no evidence indicating it won't happen here, and it is certainly reasonable to suggest it might. "I mean, [interchange] is squeezed down so much, there's got to be profitability in there someplace."

Federgreen feels Australia's interchange regulation set "government thresholds and a whole series of rules ... that cause costs to go down for the retailer, but the banks then passed [those additional costs] to the consumer side, and the banks' profitability actually went up."

Florum said Visa's position is that the government's intervention in such a manner creates an inherently anti-consumer and pro-retailer system. "Consumerism is a general topic - a crowd pleaser," Federgreen said. "In today's environment anything [the government] says that consumers believe will help them at the end of the day is going to carry a lot of weight."

A false god

However, Federgreen believes interchange is not the real culprit. "I think that interchange is a false god ... the real issue is downgrades and fees," he said. Downgrades are applied to transactions that do not qualify at the interchange level at which merchants submit them for processing; merchants pay a premium for those transactions.

"That's where the real costs are. Adding to that is the uncontrolled way that the system is managed on the merchants' side," he added.

It's not too late to get involved. HR 5546 heads next to the floor of the U.S. House of Representatives for a vote to determine if it will pass to the president's desk, where it may be signed into law. A date for the vote has not yet been set.

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

previous next

Spotlight Innovators:

North American Bancard | USAePay | Super G Capital LLC | Humboldt Merchant Services | Impact Paysystems | Electronic Merchant Systems