GS Logo
The Green Sheet, Inc

Please Log in

A Thing
View Archives

View flipbook of this issue

Care to Share?


Table of Contents

Lead Story

Simple ways to better your business

News

Industry Update

Feds place chokehold on banks, processors

Apple changes app rules to include virtual currencies

Square ditches mobile wallet, offers cash advances

Features

Your next third-party partner: Friend or foe?

mPOS shaking things up

ISOMetrics:
Alternative payments gaining momentum

Views

A fresh look at chargeback insurance

Gene Lieb and Laura Kaiser
Business Financial Resources

Education

Street SmartsSM:
Auto-pilot and self reflection

Tom Waters and Ben Abel
Bank Associates Merchant Services

TRO/asset freeze: The FTC's nuclear option

Michael Thurman
Thurman Legal

Is that a terminal or a PIN pad?

Dale S. Laszig
DSL Direct LLC

Top five legal issues in the MCA industry

Andrew T. Hayner
Jaffe, Raitt, Heuer & Weiss P.C

Company Profile

Chargebacks911

New Products

Dynamic POS suite

DynaPro, DynaPro Mini
MagTek Inc.

FI-proven platform for merchants

SmartVista for Retailers
BPC Banking Technologies

Inspiration

Discovery leads to delight

Departments

Readers Speak

Resource Guide

Datebook

A Bigger Thing

The Green Sheet Online Edition

June 23, 2014  •  Issue 14:06:02

previous next

Feds place chokehold on banks, processors

Members of the U.S. Congress and the business community are livid over a controversial federal program that aims to "choke out" access to the banking system by businesses deemed high risk or otherwise objectionable, albeit legal. The hit list includes gun shops, coin dealers, check cashing establishments and payday lenders. Despite the uproar, the U.S. Department of Justice doesn't seem inclined to back down.

The program, launched in April 2013 and known as Operation Choke Point, resulted in over 50 subpoenas being issued to banks and payment processors in just nine months, according to a report released on May 29, 2014, by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The DOJ program has also prompted related crackdowns by state and federal financial services regulators, and in turn resulted in several banks and acquirers terminating relationships with businesses that regulators consider objectionable.

Bad for business

In an April 2014 letter to the DOJ and members of Congress, the Independent Community Bankers of America said Operation Choke Point is bad for business. "While preventing fraud is a top concern for community banks, it needs to be balanced with ensuring that businesses and consumers that operate in accordance with applicable laws can still access payment systems," wrote ICBA President and Chief Executive Officer Camden R. Fine.

Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., Chairman of the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform, called the program an "abuse of power" by the DOJ. "If the administration believes some businesses should be out of business, they should prosecute them before a judge and jury," he said. "By forcibly conscripting banks to do their bidding, the Justice Department has avoided any review and any check on their power."

According to the house committee's report, "Operation Choke Point has forced banks to terminate relationships with a wide variety of entirely lawful and legitimate businesses." And the report offers evidence (in the form of internal memoranda) that the DOJ isn't concerned about the program's impact on what it terms legitimate merchants.

The committee's report did not name the affected banks and processors, but Dow Jones Business News reported that several banks have disclosed investigations related to Operation Choke Point, including PNC Financial Services Group, Salt Lake City-based Zions Bancorp. and Four Oaks Fincorp Inc.

The case against Four Oaks

Four Oaks reached a $1.2 million settlement with the DOJ in January 2014 over allegations that it processed in excess of $2 billion in payments for allegedly fraudulent merchants.

The DOJ offered details of the Four Oaks case in a May 7, 2014, departmental blog post. The post said a Texas-based processor that processed payments for Four Oaks was initiating unauthorized debits to consumer accounts, but that the bank ignored those warnings in exchange for more than $850,000 in transaction fees.

"The Justice Department has made it a priority to hold the perpetrators of consumer fraud accountable," DOJ attorneys wrote in the blog post. "And when financial institutions choose to process transactions even though they know the transactions are fraudulent, or willfully ignore clear evidence of fraud, they are profiting from illegal activities as well as breaking federal law."

Private sector response

The DOJ program has prompted several initiatives in response. The Electronic Transactions Association released a comprehensive set of guidelines for ISOs and processors on how to underwrite, monitor and manage risks associated with customer relationships. And at least one vendor has introduced a merchant investigation and monitoring solution for high-risk merchants.

The product, which goes by the name KYC Governor, was developed by Bellevue, Wash.-based G2 Web Services to help banks and their acquiring partners prevent the boarding of merchants outside their risk parameters, which might trigger Operation Choke Point subpoenas.

"The goal of KYC Governor is to reduce the fear and uncertainty banks are feeling from Operation Choke Point, and the fines and subpoenas that have come along with it," said Ed Barton, President of G2 Web Services.

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

previous next

Spotlight Innovators:

USAePay | Impact Paysystems | Electronic Merchant Systems | Inovio | Board Studios, Inc.