GS Logo
The Green Sheet, Inc

Please Log in

Banner Ad
View Archives

View PDF of this issue

Care to Share?


Table of Contents

Lead Story

Tight credit markets lead to new ISO, MLS financing options

News

Industry Update

Major retailers reject proposed interchange settlement

LevelUp offers interchange-free mobile solution

Google Shopping to take on Amazon?

Trade Association News

Features

GS Advisory Board:
New times, new strategies: What are you doing? - Part 2

Meet The Expert: Mark Cerminaro

The game in the name

Selling Prepaid

Prepaid in brief

Prepaid, mobile and money laundering

Understanding merchant needs is critical

Views

The card company settlement: What's next?

Brandes Elitch
CrossCheck Inc.

Education

Street SmartsSM:
The secrets to overcoming objections

Jeff Fortney
Clearent LLC

The best prospects are in your portfolio

Peggy Bekavac Olson
Strategic Marketing

Fifty little things I've learned

Jeff Broudy
Total Merchant Services

MFA: The acquirer's role in taxing online sales

Adam Atlas
Attorney at Law

Are you ready for mPOS?

John Biscevic
retailcloud

Company Profile

National Benefit Programs LLC

New Products

Rapid PCI compliance for merchants

PCI Rapid Comply
First Data Corp.

Cloud-based POS platform for SMBs

NCR Silver
NCR Corp.

Inspiration

A handshake with that cup of Joe

Departments

Forum

Resource Guide

Datebook

Skyscraper Ad

The Green Sheet Online Edition

August 13, 2012  •  Issue 12:08:01

previous next

Major retailers reject proposed interchange settlement

Some of the biggest retailers and retail associations in the country are rejecting their own attorneys' proposed settlement of a class action antitrust lawsuit brought against card companies Visa Inc., MasterCard Worldwide and a number of card issuing banks.

Wal-Mart Stores Inc., Target Brands Inc., the nac National Association of Convenience Stores and the National Grocers Association are all publicly repudiating the $7.25 billion settlement proposal submitted by attorneys representing their class to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York on July 13, 2012.

The merchants are rejecting the settlement even though their attorneys believe it to be the largest offer in the history of Sherman Act antitrust litigation. The merchants said they intend to continue to press antitrust claims against the card companies in an effort to create what they believe would be a fairer interchange system.

The settlement

The law firms of Robins, Kaplan, Miller & Ciresi LLP.; Berger & Montague P.C.; and Robbins, Geller, Rudman & Dowd LLP were appointed by the District Court in 2005 to represent the nearly 7 million merchant plaintiffs participating in the class action. The merchants' antitrust action alleges Visa, MasterCard and the banks collude to unfairly set interchange fees.

The settlement proposal calls for the defendants to pay $6.05 billion for past damages. The card companies would also agree to sustain a temporary reduction of 10 basis points in their interchange rates to add an additional $10 billion in settlement value for merchants. Visa estimated it will pay $4.4 billion if the settlement is approved. MasterCard said it will pay $790 million. The balance of the settlement would be paid by the defendant banks.

In addition, the settlement would allow merchants more freedom to disclose card fees, impose surcharges to recapture those fees and steer customers to less expensive payment options. "These new rules will give merchants the tools they need to put pressure on the credit card networks to lower interchange or 'swipe' fees," said Patrick Coughlin, an attorney with the Robbins, Geller firm.

The retailers' views

The retailers dissenting from the settlement insist the interchange system is "broken" and the proposed settlement payment, which amounts to less than two months' worth of interchange fees (based on an estimated $50 billion in such fees collected annually), fails to make the system either more competitive or more transparent.

"This proposed settlement allows the card companies to continue to dictate the prices banks charge and the rules that constrain the market, including for emerging payment methods, particularly mobile payments," NACS Chairman Tom Robinson said.

The NACS noted there is nothing in the agreement that would prevent Visa or MasterCard from raising rates to a point where merchants would be paying for their own settlement.

Wal-Mart issued a statement calling on "all merchants to put consumers first and reject the settlement." The company also said the proposed settlement "would not structurally change the broken market or prohibit credit card networks from continually increasing hidden swipe fees."

Target stated, "Target has no interest in surcharging guests who use credit and debit in order to allow Visa and MasterCard to continue charging unfair fees."

The NGA hired Constantine Cannon LLP to represent it going forward. It is the law firm that negotiated a $3.4 billion settlement in 2003 to resolve similar antitrust claims against Visa and MasterCard. That settlement resolved all antitrust claims against the companies up to January 2004. The new proposed settlement would cover all antitrust actions, past and future, occurring after Jan. 1, 2004.

Payments industry perspectives

Joseph Saunders, Visa Chairman and Chief Executive Officer, said, "We believe settling this case is in the best interests of all parties. We are comfortable with the terms, which we do not anticipate will impact our current guidance."

Noah Hanft, MasterCard General Counsel and Chief Franchise Executive Officer, stated, "Although we have strong defenses to all claims, a settlement avoids years of litigation and uncertainties that are inherent in such cases. We believe that today's settlements should resolve all issues with the merchant community."

Payments industry associations offered support for the proposed settlement. However, Jason Oxman, Electronic Transactions Association Chief Executive Officer, expressed concern that the settlement proposal would allow merchants to surcharge without reducing prices. He cautioned merchants not to impose surcharges on cards "to the detriment of their own customers."

The Electronic Payments Coalition hailed the agreement but noted surcharging is banned in 10 states.

For additional news stories, please visit www.greensheet.com and click on "Read the Entire Story" in the center column below the latest news story excerpt. This will take you to the full text of that story, followed by all other news stories posted online.

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

previous next

Spotlight Innovators:

North American Bancard | Harbortouch | USAePay | IRISCRM.COM | Humboldt Merchant Services