GS Logo
The Green Sheet, Inc

Please Log in

A Thing
View Archives

View PDF of this issue

Care to Share?

Table of Contents

Lead Story

Legislative outlook:
Some clouds but no rain

Patti Murphy
The Takoma Group


Industry Update

New fees, more money for Visa, MasterCard

RBS, Heartland PCI compliance revoked: What's next?

A token of payments to come

Raising the ACH bar

Virtucard for virtual goods


Bill Pirtle

Breaches across America
installment two

Selling Prepaid

Prepaid in brief

Boom time for prepaid game card market

Global payroll done with SaaS

The state of escheatment


Be the toast of hosts

Scott Henry

Sluggish economy spurs faster payments

Nasreen Quibria
Association for Financial Professionals

Mobile payments? Not yet

Biff Matthews
CardWare International


Street SmartsSM:
Who are you?

Jon Perry and Vanessa Lang

Pull back the expense curtain

Jeff Fortney
Clearent LLC

Downshifting to rev up sales

Christian Murray
Global eTelecom Inc.

PCI versus tricky technology

Michael Wright
Panoptic Security Inc.

Five magical questions in making sales

Daniel Wadleigh
Marketing Consultant

Company Profile

UseMyBank Services Inc.

Data Delivery Services Inc.

New Products

Instant mobile processing

MerchantWare Mobile
Company: Merchant Warehouse

A most literate check reader

Company: Parascript LLC


See it, believe it



Resource Guide


A Bigger Thing

The Green Sheet Online Edition

April 13, 2009  •  Issue 09:04:01

previous next

The state of escheatment

The Network Branded Prepaid Card Association unveiled a white paper at the 2009 Prepaid Card Expo that examines the confusing and awkward intersection between state abandoned property laws and prepaid cards. As the prepaid card industry develops, the NBPCA believes the laws that govern escheatment must be clarified for the industry to reach its full potential.

Modern escheatment laws originated from the unclaimed property laws of feudal England. In medieval times, the laws ensured that property did not remain in legal limbo after the owners died, but were "escheated" back to superiors, such as feudal lords or kings.

In the United States of the 19th and 20th centuries, the concept of escheatment developed state by state to include "intangible personal property (such as funds underlying uncashed checks in a checking account)," the NBPCA said. As the economy grew and businesses expanded beyond state lines, conflicting state claims concerning escheatment arose.


In recent decades, federal Uniform Acts have attempted to bring disparate state laws into conformity. According to the NBPCA, the 1981 Uniform Unclaimed Property Act added gift certificates to the definition of intangible property; in 1995, the act was expanded to cover prepaid cards. "This broad expansion meant that a merchant was required to pay the state for unredeemed gift certificates in cash, even though the merchant only was obligated to provide goods or services to the purchaser," the NBPCA said. "At least one court held that these laws constituted an unconstitutional taking of property from a merchant without due process."

Many states agreed with this verdict and refused to include gift cards and similar products under their escheatment laws, the NBPCA noted. While the association does not argue for or against the worthiness of tying prepaid cards to escheatment laws, it has concluded the laws that do exist are inadequate in dealing with the complexities of divergent prepaid card products.

For example, many state laws lump payroll, rewards, travel and teen cards into the gift certificate category, "without regard to their specific makeup, purpose or functionality," the NBPCA said.

The reason for this lack of specificity rests in the relative newness of prepaid cards. The NBPCA called prepaid cards "a poster child for the difficulties of applying existing laws to products or situations that were hardly imaginable when the laws were written."

One law does not fit all

The NBPCA enumerates many areas of the laws that need to be addressed, including:

The NBPCA argues that, unlike closed-loop cards, open-loop cards can be used much like debit cards to access cash from ATMs and pay for goods and services from any number of merchants "over a longer period of time." Therefore, open-loop cardholders should be given a larger presumption of abandonment period than users of closed-loop cards.

Another problem area that the NBPCA said needs to be tackled is what funds escheat to what states. Do funds escheat to the state where the card buyer purchased the card or to the state where the card was used?

As the NBPCA pointed out, the individual who uses a gift card, for example, may live in a different state from the person who purchased the card. As for open-loop cards, the NBPCA said most of them are issued by banks. The way banks are constituted complicates which states are escheated funds.

"Consider a bank chartered in Delaware, with a holding company parent incorporated in Virginia, doing business in multiple states but with most of its employees in Utah," the NBPCA said. "Which state receives escheated funds?"


The NBPCA considers that escheatment laws in the United States may hinder U.S. companies in the global prepaid marketplace. The NBPCA claims only in the United States and certain Canadian provinces are prepaid cards subject to escheat laws.

"Nowhere else do retailers lose the breakage [leftover amounts] on their gift certificates or gift cards; nowhere else do businesses forgo the benefits of uncashed checks and certificates and pay the funds to the states as a sort of additional 'tax'," the NBPCA said. "As the industry expands to Europe, Asia and South America, the U.S. industry may face increased competition from institutions that are not subject to comparable laws."

Additionally, escheatment laws imposed on prepaid cards cause issuers to pass on the costs to consumers in the form of higher fees, the NBPCA noted.

No square cards in round holes

In conclusion, the NBPCA recognizes the funds garnered through escheatment laws can be an important revenue stream for cash-strapped states, especially in economic downturns. But, if such laws are to exist, the NBPCA urges state legislatures to take into account the particularities of prepaid cards when enacting legislation, rather than force rules onto the prepaid card industry using the existing legal framework.

For more stories from SellingPrepaid E-Magazine, as well as breaking news and forums devoted to the prepaid sphere, please visit

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

previous next

Spotlight Innovators:

North American Bancard | USAePay | Board Studios