Page 40 - gs260602

Insights and Expertise

Many acquirers will simply exclude This compression is one of the reasons the industry is
shifting toward W-2 internal sales teams and technology-
high-risk verticals from the purchase integrated distribution models, which allow ISOs to

entirely—buying only the control more of the economics while maintaining quality
and underwriting discipline.
low-risk portion of the book—which Beyond the margin impact, agent compensation
means the seller receives value structures also affect transaction flexibility. Agreements
on only a fraction of what they that lack buyout provisions, performance minimums or
sunset clauses can create significant friction in any sale
thought they were selling. or financing event—because the buyer or lender must
underwrite the net-of-agent residual, not the gross.

The cross-portfolio benchmark we observe is From the buyer's side, agent economics are often the
approximately $288 per month across all active merchants, first thing modeled after gross residual. A buyer will
or roughly $436 per month when measured against calculate the net residual after all agent splits and then
processing merchants only. apply their valuation multiple to that net number—not
the gross. If agent payouts consume 45 percent or more of
Lower-volume merchants—those processing under $15,000 gross revenue, the buyer is effectively paying a premium
per month—tend to have higher churn rates, weaker multiple on a much smaller income stream.
business fundamentals and lower lifetime value. Higher-
volume merchants processing $50,000 or more per month Worse, if those agent agreements are non-terminable
typically represent established businesses with longer and non-negotiable, the buyer has inherited a fixed cost
operating histories and stronger retention characteristics. structure they cannot optimize. This is one of the most
common reasons that sellers are disappointed by the
This creates a counterintuitive dynamic: a portfolio of offers they receive—they are thinking in gross residual
500 high-quality merchants processing $75,000 per month terms, while the buyer is pricing net-of-agent economics.
each may be worth significantly more than a portfolio of
2,000 merchants processing $10,000 per month each, even ISO owners building portfolios with an eye toward future
if the total residual income is similar. The first portfolio liquidity should think carefully about how their current
has lower attrition risk, lower servicing costs and higher agent agreements will be viewed by the other side of the
revenue durability—all factors that increase valuation table when that day comes. More importantly, there are
multiples. practical steps ISOs can take now to move the needle on
compensation economics without losing their ability to
Buyers understand this math intuitively. When evaluating attract and retain productive agents:
two portfolios with identical gross residuals, a buyer will
pay a premium for the one with fewer, higher-quality • Expand the product suite beyond payments-only.
merchants—because the cost to service those accounts is When an ISO can offer agents the ability to earn com-
lower, the expected retention is higher, and the revenue missions on POS equipment leasing, merchant cash
per merchant provides a larger cushion against natural advances, working capital products or other value-
attrition. added services, the total compensation opportunity
increases without inflating the residual split. Agents
The portfolio with thousands of low-volume accounts earn more in aggregate, and the ISO preserves more
may look impressive on a merchant count basis, but a of the residual economics that drive portfolio valua-
buyer sees higher servicing costs, higher churn risk and a tion.
thinner margin of safety on every account. • Structure new agent agreements with a reasonable
4. Agent compensation structure: buyout clause from the outset. The goal is not to elim-
The margin compression problem inate agent compensation—it is to create a defined
mechanism that gives the ISO flexibility in a future
One of the most frequently underestimated risks in ISO capital event. A well-structured buyout provision,
portfolio valuation is the agent compensation structure. paired with an attractive upfront commission and
competitive residual split, creates an agreement that
Across our advisory engagements, we consistently observe agents will accept and that buyers will not penalize.
agent payout ratios trending upward—in some cases rising The key is building this into the agreement from Day
by several percentage points within a single year. When 1, not trying to retrofit it years later when the ISO is
agent costs begin consuming 40 percent to 50 percent or already in a sale process.
more of gross revenue, the net residual available to the
ISO owner—and by extension, to any buyer or lender—is • Consider blended compensation models that com-
substantially reduced. bine competitive upfront bonuses with moderate re-
40