Page 31 - gs260301
P. 31

Insights and Expertise



             • Out-of-state state banks
             • Payment networks and processors (when support-                    The Illinois effect:
               ing the above institutions)                             states eye their own interchange limits

        These entities can continue using transaction data for      Illinois may be the first state to pass a law ban-
        fraud monitoring, rewards programs, dispute resolution,     ning interchange fees  on the tax and gratuity
        AML compliance and analytics.                               portions of card transactions, but it is unlikely
                                                                    to be the last. In fact, the Interchange Fee Prohi-
        But here's the catch: the restriction still applies to out-of-  bition Act (IFPA) has already triggered a wave
        state state-chartered credit unions and some savings in-    of legislative interest around the country as law-
        stitutions. This creates a compliance patchwork where       makers examine whether similar restrictions
        networks must track which institutions are exempt and       could reduce merchant costs.
        which aren't.
                                                                    Several states have introduced or discussed
        What happens next                                           legislation that would mirror some or all of Il-
        Following are three responses coming as a result the rul-   linois’ approach. According to industry tracking
        ing in favor of the IFPA:                                   by merchant and banking groups, proposals to
                                                                    restrict interchange on sales tax or tips have sur-
           1. The Illinois Bankers Association announced it will    faced in states including Arizona, Connecticut,
           appeal to the Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals. How-     Kansas, Maryland, New York and Texas, in ad-
           ever, there's no automatic stay. Meaning, unless the ap-  dition to the District of Columbia.
           peals court intervenes, the law takes effect July 1, 2026.
           2. To make matters more complicated, 22 states have in-  Pennsylvania lawmakers have floated a narrow-
           troduced or previewed interchange legislation. The Il-   er measure focused on the sales tax portion of
           linois Retail Merchants Association called this decision   transactions, while Washington state has exam-
           "a model for other states." Expect copycat bills.        ined limits tied specifically to gratuities.
           3. Industry groups are urging the Illinois legislature   Meanwhile, Florida, Georgia and Tennessee
           to repeal the law. The Electronic Payments Coalition
           called it a "reckless policy" that will "inflict credit card   have explored the issue through legislative com-
                                                                    mittees or policy discussions aimed at studying
           chaos."
                                                                    the impact of interchange fees on merchants and
        What you should do now                                      consumers. Other states, including Colorado,
                                                                    Massachusetts and New Jersey, have pursued
        If you're a payment network:                                broader payment-fee or card-acceptance reforms
             • Stand up implementation teams immediately: you       that could influence the same policy debate.
               have 4.5 months.
             • Begin technical design for split-basis interchange   For merchants and consumer advocates, the Il-
                                                                    linois decision offers a potential template. Sup-
               calculation.                                         porters argue that businesses should not pay fees
             • Coordinate with acquirers and issuers on the man-    on money they merely collect and pass along to
               ual submission workflow.                             governments or employees.
             • Monitor the appeal and consider requesting a stay
               of implementation.                                   For banks, card networks and payments com-
                                                                    panies, however, the prospect of a patchwork
             • Track legislation in other states, and evaluate      of state-by-state rules raises serious operational
               whether uniform standards would reduce future        concerns, particularly given the technical chang-
               compliance costs.                                    es required to separate taxes and gratuities from
                                                                    the rest of a transaction.
        If you're an acquirer or processor:
             • Survey your Illinois merchant base: can their POS    The stakes—and  the  disagreements—are  likely
               systems separately report tax and gratuity?          to intensify as Illinois’ July 1 implementation
             • Build  merchant  education  programs:  many  won't   deadline approaches.
               be ready by July 1.                                  The debate is explored in even sharper terms in a
             • Design processes for handling manual merchant        forthcoming article by Steven Peisner, vice presi-
               submissions (180-day window).                        dent of sales and marketing at Acquiring Solu-
             • Plan for increased merchant support volume           tions International and a member of The Green
               around the implementation date.                      Sheet Advisory Board. Keep an eye out for his
                                                                    byline in our next issue.


                                                                                                                31
   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36