Page 19 - GS210901
P. 19

View





        And since the Fed staff is obliged to   on routing and exclusivity." Failing that, the 17-page letter requested specific
        read them all, it's going to take time   changes and four years for issuers to prepare for compliance.
        for staff to present recommendations
        to the Fed Board of Governors, which   Four years is a long lead time, and unlikely. Debit card issuers were allowed just
        has final say over any such changes.  10 months to start complying with the original rules pertaining to merchant
                                              routing choice for debit cards.
        Both the DOJ and the FTC wrote
        that they favored the Fed's current   Patti Murphy is senior editor at The Green Sheet and co-host of the Merchant Sales Podcast.
        proposal,  but added  that  it doesn't   Follow her on Twitter @GS_PayMaven.
        go far enough. "[T]he proposal is one
        step among many that could be taken
        to address the lack of competitiveness
        in the debit card payment market,"
        the DOJ wrote.

        Both said the Fed should prohibit,
        outright,  "routing-based  incentives"
        that encourage issuers to take steps
        that ensure the card brands get
        more debit traffic on their networks.
        Routing-based incentives include
        disabling (or not enabling) certain
        features offered by networks other
        than Visa and Mastercard. "Such
        actions eviscerate merchant routing
        choice," the FTC wrote.

        Banks balk
        A coalition representing financial
        institutions that has long accused
        the Fed of regulatory overreach with
        Reg II blasted the proposed change.
        The coalition—which includes the
        American    Bankers   Association,
        the Consumer Bankers Association
        and the Credit Union National
        Association—argued it would result
        in a $27 billion windfall to the largest
        retailers at the expense of small
        merchants, banks and consumers.

        "During this trying time, our members
        have proven critical to maintaining
        the health of an American economy
        under siege. Our members also have
        greatly stepped up their payments
        products to support American
        consumers and businesses," the
        group wrote. "We did not anticipate
        a new mandate that would require us
        to undertake distracting, expensive,
        time-consuming efforts to change
        our core network infrastructure."

        The coalition wants the Fed to
        withdraw the proposed change
        "until it undertakes a proper analysis
        on the impact of any rule making


                                                                                                                19
   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24