A Thing
The Green SheetGreen Sheet

Wednesday, August 7, 2013

Double-billing error causes manic Monday

First Data Corp., the largest acquirer in the United States and privately owned by investment firm KKR & Co. LP, double-billed a sizable amount of its merchants on one day in early August 2013. The merchants affected were those whose transactions are processed on First Data's Omaha processing platform, one of five platforms First Data operates in the United States. ISOs have been inundated with calls from double-billed merchants who have their customers' payment card transactions processed on the Omaha platform.

In a statement to The Green Sheet, First Data said: "Over the weekend, some clearing bank clients reported receiving and processing duplicate month-end files from First Data. In some instances, this resulted in double postings of monthly fees to merchant accounts. Reversals have been sent to affected bank clients in order to reverse the amount debited or credited to the impacted merchants. We apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused."

A payments industry insider, with access to a reliable source of information about the double-billing issue, told The Green Sheet that the problem may have originated from duplicate automated clearing house (ACH) files.

The source said acquirers like First Data send monthly ACH batch files to merchants' banks, where merchant accounts are debited the fees acquirers charge merchants for processing credit and debit card transactions. The double-billing may have occurred when First Data sent the same files twice, according to the source. The source noted that the ACH batch file process is a combination of an automated and a manual process, and that the problem may have come to light after a merchant noticed double the size of a single debit from an account or two debits of the same amount.

Not your average snafu

The source said double-billing snafus are usually limited to "one-off" incidents. However, in the case of the First Data error, an entire platform was involved, with "many thousands" of merchants and "dozens of ISOs" affected, making the error "a pretty big mistake," according to the source.

Such an error could have serious repercussions for affected merchants. Double-billing could drain accounts and cause checks to bounce, or it could affect a merchant's line of credit, the source said.

The error could also be equally damaging to ISOs, as the error may be the final trigger causing merchants to jump to other processors and service providers. If merchants were already disgruntled or close to abandoning their First Data ISOs already, "this is the kind of thing that would put a merchant over the edge," the source said.

But First Data's size and influence in the merchant sector could possibly cancel out merchant attrition, according to the source. ISOs can make the case to affected merchants that it doesn't make sense to go to a rival service provider if that provider also processes through First Data and thus experienced the same double-billing error.

Taking a broader view of the error, the source said, "It's just a bad moment for everyone."

A 'damage-control' day

An ISO with several thousand First Data accounts characterized Monday, Aug. 5, 2013, as an "insane, everybody-goes-to-happy-hour kind of day." The ISO said its call volume more than doubled on Monday from merchants calling customer service over the double-billing error.

It was an unprecedented day for the ISO. The firm expects call volume to rise over predictable events, such as when the ISO sends out a bulletin to merchants that interchange fees are going up or when merchants are assessed an annual fee. But Monday was not one of those occasions. "Yesterday was just a nightmare, damage-control day," the ISO said.

But the ISO noted that most merchants were reasonable about the situation and they were, for the most part, "happy that we acknowledge that it happened," and that the situation was being remedied.

However, the ISO noted that there will be fallout from the error, with merchants cancelling their service contracts. The ISO is concerned about small, "shoestring" merchants terminating the merchant services relationship after experiencing overdraft difficulties due to the error. But it's still too early to tell what the cost from the error will be, as not all merchants check their account balances every day, the ISO said.

end of article

Editor's Note:

The Green Sheet Inc. is now a proud affiliate of Bankcard Life, a premier community that provides industry-leading training and resources for payment professionals. Click here for more information.

Notice to readers: These are archived articles. Contact names or information may be out of date. We regret any inconvenience.

Facebook
Twitter
LinkedIn
2024 2023 2022 2021 2020 2019 2018 2017 2016 2015 2014 2013 2012 2011 2010 2009 2008 2007
A Thing